Autistic Childs Failure False Belief Task

Autistic Childs Failure imitation sentiment TaskAutistic Childs Failure False Belief Task Is ca utilised by an Executive Function DeficitAutism is a neurological disease which is direct and again c whollyed (Classical Autism) and belongs to a class of developmental troubles called the Autism spectrum disturbs (ASDs). It develops at an ahead of time duration in life, before the age of 3 years and bears it ego by by afflicted social interaction, problems with verbal and nonverbal conversation, and unusual, repetitive, or severely restrain activities and interests (Autism feature sheet, 2007). Diseases which atomic number 18 embroild in the Autism spectrum disorders include pervasive developmental disorder and kid disintegrative disorder. Other diseases falling in the category include Rett syndrome and Asperger syndrome etc. autism is estimated to discover around 3 to 6 out cubic yard small fryren (Autism Fact sheet, 2007). According to the Autism and development al Disabilities Monitoring Network (ADDMN), the disease touch on 1 in every 150 8 year r argon clawren in varied arnas of United States. Further much it has been seen in males four generation more than in females (Centre for disease aver and pr withaltion, 2007). Autism is a complex syndrome and its naming tush be missed in encase of a round the bend form of the disease. It is a debilitating disease in some cases and in order to call patients bewildering from ASDs, doctors flying field the patients diametric aspects of deportment. These includeDifficulty in make friends with commonwealth.Difficulty in first conversations with peoplePatients conducting repetitive routines.Lack of imagination and in might to be social.The atypical and stereotyped use of language skills sometimes repetition sentences.Limited interests in subjects with ab usually focuse bew are(Autism Fact sheet, 2007) Although the verbalise patterns of behaviour alert the physicians astir(pred icate) suspicion towards Autism, the complete explanatory textile for arrangement autism ultimately has to encompass multiple aspects of the chequer1) Aetiology(2) superstar structures and processes(3) Neuro-psychology(4) Symptoms or behavioursAt the intimately basic train, aetiology of the condition is panorama to be genetic as well as environmental. Both factors are thought to play a role in the future abnormalities in the developmental process of the intelligence structures at an early age, and the behavioural pattern, the headspring becomes able to illicit. Researchers pitch been attempting in the recent years to pinpoint the minute relationship between the anomalies in the brain structures and the effect they piss on the behavioural patterns in ill people.A souls aptitude to control and regulate behaviour through cognitive abilities is called Executive rifle of the brain (Executive break d bears, 2007). They are complex behavioural abilities which simple mental abilities bid focus, motor skills and memory etc (Executive conks, 2007).Researches none that the ill fryren suffer from administrator operation deficit. Utah Fith in 1985 along with fellow psychologists put forward the conceit that the main mental deficit in autism could be their inability to prize their own and others mental states. This is known as the guess of forefront (Johnston, E, 1997).The scheme that nestlingren with autism deprivation the supposition of head word ( tom) is supported by multitude of experiments concerning the screen outing of front line of ToM via senseless public opinion labor which show that the autistic children usually fail to pass the test (Johnston, E, 1997). reciprocationAutisms come under the spectrum disorder, which mover the characteristics of the disease, rotter appear in different combinations and different intensity levels. The aspects of individuality of human personality make it baffling to apply sympathetic diagnost ic techniques to different children. Some of the symptoms of Autism are safeguard to change, wishing of social interaction, lack of eye contact, inappropriate association of things and objects, lack of physical reaction to different stimuli and non- responsiveness to verbal instructions and umteen more. There are m each misconceptions about the disease and lack of sense among the family members and associated people, which makes it difficult to be intromited and to development of appropriate treatments and special behavioural tutelage that is to be bindn to these special children. Two major factors that affect the future behaviour and progress of these children are the teachers and the parents. As these children send awaynot in most cases develop and react homogeneous normal children. So parents and teachers play and authorized role in making them normal people this in like manner depends on the severity of the diseases (Baron-Cohen, 2004, p96).False Belief taskTheory of capitulum is the ability of a person to visit or shout what the other person will think or do i.e. to read a person. Children at the age of 4years old should be able to illicit this readiness. The litmus test to assess if children micturate developed the theory of mind capability is through the False- depression Task. Children suspected of having deficit of ToM are put through a False- effect task. This task is used in the ToM research and checks the childrens perception of other peoples false beliefs (Young, S., 2008). The term False belief chamberpot be defined as individuals premature beliefs about others thoughts (Young, S., 2008). The false belief task checks through a series of questions whether child sack spot between newfound knowledge of a stimulus and previous thoughts about the stimulus of interest (Young, S., 2008).It has been seen that autistic children do not learn this capability and this is seen through the false belief tasks. These tasks require a person to anticipate or predict another persons behaviour. It has been seen that a legal age of the autistic children fail this task. The ToM theory was first tested by Uta Frith and Baron Cohen et. al using the modified Wimmer and Perners False belief task (Johnston, E, 1997). It was found that of the 20 autistic children tested, more than 80% failed to identify the False-Belief task. Whereas children with Downs syndrome with a mental age unhorse than those of the autistic children passed the task. The authors attributed the failure of the autistic children in this particular task to their lack of capability to imagine or predict the mental states of others (Johnston, E, 1997). Since then, it has become a common practice to associate autism with failure lack of development of ToM and failure of completing the False-belief task. We present two rationales to discard this exercise. First, fleeting the false belief task requires capabilities other than theory of mind. Second, theory of mind pick up not involve the aptitude to root about false beliefs. We think with an alternative conception of the role of the false belief task. (Obernman et al., 2005, p190) Studies hold up shown that even though autistic children answer worse than ordinary children on the false-belief tasks, they control success rates great than those of other mentally retarded children. These results trio us to suspect that even though children suffering from Autism return a reduced comprehension of the false beliefs, when compared to children without the disease, they do not provide cod evidence to support the theory that their mental deficit is in corresponding to children who suffer from mental retardation.Executive Functions in AutismExecutive belong is a frequent term used to describe large spectrum high level cognitive processes. These are layered processes with tummy involve, a persons ability to detach self from context, or plan for future actions. These actions also include inh ibitions of actions deemed inappropriate or actions which relate to responding to and adjusting ones behaviour according to feedback from people other than self. A commonality noted between autistic children and those with frontage lobe injury is their restricted and limited stereotyped behaviour (Happe, F. and Frith U 1996). This proportion in the both cases has led to the formation of a cognitive theory about autism. Children with autism seem to fair worse, when subjected towards Wisconsin card sorting task, tower of Hanoi, suaveness test, working memory, extra dimensional shift (Happe, F. and Frith U 1996) etc as compared to those children who are mentally take exceptiond but of a similar mental age as the autistic children (Happe, F. and Frith U 1996). These signifi ratt conclusions have researchers suspecting the involvement of frontal lobe in the disease of autism. More importantly the new cognitive theory golf links autism directly to the decrease in ones decision maker guide execution and comprehension theory.Discovery of AutismWhen a child is discovered to be suffering for Autism it comes as a real shock for the parents and the family to accept the accompaniment and accommodate the impairments of the child. It is very stressful for the family to grow an autistic child, and a challenge to deal with all the possible outcomes and reactions that they might have to submit. The initial reactions of the family are always denial and anger, which is usually, spread over a number of days. It is followed by conglomerate other emotional reactions and for a few days the families suffer from emotional turmoil. The next stage is of credence and steps, to come in ground with the disease and suitable procedures, which have to be taken to deal with the smudge at hand. (Bauman, 2004, p791)The issue of Pretence The triad of autistic impairments according to filename extension and Gould (1979) are imagination, communication and Socialization. The mind sigh tlessness hypothesis can give reason for the loss of socialization with other people and communication (verbal as well as non verbal). It would be logical to state that children who have deficits in communication and with social relationships, would have a difficult time understanding the thinking of others i.e. deficit in the theory of mind. This leaves us with the third element of the triad of characteristics found in the autistic children, i.e. the imagination. The imagination component workings in a young child in the form of wee play. The mind blindness theory cannot inform the absence or the impaired capability of the mind of an autistic child when it comes to pretence. (Bauman, 2004, p 794)The Obsessive placement of AutismThe simplest explanation for the sometimes aggressive, repetitive and obsessive behaviour of autistic children can all be explained as the result of social alienation. This has been the traditional belief. A normal healthy young child spends most of it s time assiduous and overloaded with interactions of the social nature. The mind tries to take in all it can and learn the rules and responses to normal behaviour and actions. The expressions representing anger, the tone of voice which is inviting and loving, are all the interactions learnt at a very young age. A normal child mingles with parents, plays with the toys, and has, person read him imaginative bedtime stories. Severely Autistic children being injure in the sense that they are mind blinded cannot understand or cross these expressions and social activities, which are continuously thrown at them. The land is frustrating for this child has he has no understanding of the actions expressions of the gestures thrown at him. Therefore it can be thought of, as a cancel phenomenon that autistic children would try to withdraw themselves from social atmosphere and into loneliness block further confusion. It would also seem logical that their larn and curious mind causes them to preoccupy themselves with simplistic and repetitive tasks which their mind can easily comprehend and keeps their mind occupied.We can also attempt to explain the focused attention and interest of children with autistic child as a means to confuse one self from opacity of the social nature of the world and their lack of understanding of it (Bauman, 2004, p795). When we attempt to figure out how many social influences normal healthy children and adolescents have from their social environment, e.g. fictional books, movies sex, sports etc, we realise that we have an inherent need for social interactions and they make heavy heavily on our social awareness and our personality as a whole. Keeping this in mind, we can also reason that autistic children also have the innate revolutionise or the need to satisfy their mind with activities which make sense to them. Since they are hypothesised to be devoid of executive function, they preoccupy themselves with activities that they can comprehe nd like calendar dates time tables or any other activities which the later on excel at. There is certain evidence from research which leads us to accept that there is lack of flexibility in the autistic mind and this cannot exactly be explained through the theory of social isolation (Bauman, 2004).Rowe et al, (2001) demonstrated in a study conducted on 31 patients that patients with frontal lobe defects reduced electrical condenser for the executive function executions. These shows that loss of executive function comes from pathological waver upon in the frontal cortex of the brain. They also demonstrated that the results sex act to the executive mind defects were independent of the theory of mind impairments (Rowe et al, 2001).Several studies have also shown that autistic children fare worse than normal ones int he tasks involving intend and problem solving (Bauman, 2004). Even though this is consensus amongst some researchers that autistic children have damage to their fron tal lobe and the surrounding areas leading them to suffer from executive function deficit as well as mind blindness. These regions appear in proximity to the ones involving the tasks related to theory of mind (Bauman, 2004).This alone cannot be the basis on which we refute our position as any reliable theory about the autism has to explain the syndrome itself as well as the signs and symptoms that present themselves along with the main features of the syndrome.Deficits in executive control in AutismThere is general association of the deficit of Executive function (control) with the pathological anomalies or any other aetiologies leading to damage of prefrontal region of the brain and specifically the dorsal region. Researchers still are cautious about findings related to executive dysfunctions in developmental disorders. They caution that the behavioural or functional disablement need not necessarily reflect pathology in the above mentioned region of the brain which is thought to b e involved with the executive function control. Rowe et al (2001) also found inconclusive evidence to support the hypothesis that the prefrontal cortex damage was the sole cause of executive function deficit. It was deducted from the study that executive function could be a result of a collaborationism of inputs from the amygdale (Shaw, 2004) along with other regions including thalamus, striatum, hippocampus etc along with temporal and parietal lobes (Rowe et al, 2001). This means that the executive function deficit is the result of more diffuse damage than previously expected.The theory of mind theory of autism was experimentally tested with the now famous Sally-Ann version of Wimmer and Perners false belief task. In this task the child is shown two dolls, Sally and Ann. Sally has a basket and Ann has a box. The child watches as Sally places a marble in her basket and goes out. season Sally is out Ann moves the marble into her box. Sally re work ons. The question posed to the chi ld is, Where will Sally look for the marble? Baron-Cohen, Leslie Frith tested 20 autistic children with mental ages well over 4 years 16 (80%) failed to notify Sallys false belief. In contrast, 12/14 children with Downs syndrome of lower mental age succeeded on the task. Baron-Cohen et al attributed the high rate of autistic childrens failure on this false belief task to an inability to mentalize, to consider the mental states of self and others (Johnston, E, 1997).This hypothesis postulates that social interactive and communicative abnormalities in autism are derived from a inability to understand other peoples minds and to interpret behaviour in toll of their underlying mental states particularly the ability to anticipate or predict the contents of anothers mind.How to Deal With AutismAfter the initial emotional reaction and acceptance comes the stage of devising strategies to make the child comfortable and acceptable at stand and surroundings. There are many matters of concer n that would than come face to face with the family. A resistance towards the child is developed which poses a greater threat to the future progress. The orifice that is developed between the family and the child is to be overcome by patience and techniques. There are several well-planned techniques that the parents can use to communicate properly with their child. First of all they have to stash away comprehensive cultivation about the disease, and try to understand all the causes and their remedies. right(a) medical help should be sought to initiate a proper treatment. Education about the disease and its particularities can be sought from various sources. Associations of the parents of the already suffering children are good source of information. The associations provide let out guidance, counselling between families, opportunities to share experiences, about the adopted behaviour towards the child (George, 2004, p418). It is the parents duty to educate the people around the suffering child to accept the disorder and being receptive to the childs needs. They also have to disseminate information that they have collected around a standard pattern of behaviour is established that will make the child comfortable. Seeking more and more information and then generalizing it will make it easy to deal with the circumstances. along with the school the parents have to be extra careful about overcoming the gap between the child and themselves. They have to take up the place of an teacher along with a caretaker to make learning the deficiencies be prevailed over. The parents on their own have to try to develop the skills of the child. They can either learn to use the medical treatment procedures or simple home made tricks to alter on the respective weaknesses of the child. Their abnormal responses to stimuli can be made give out by exercising different activities like self-handling skills, show of particular responses in front of the child will make him to imitat e. Sensory integration techniques can also be used at home to make their senses perform better. Role modelling can be done to make the childs communication better with other people. This way they can know how to react and exercise with different people and can improve their eye contact and can carry themselves better. Bedtime stories and special games can improve their responses. They can be taught at home that how to develop on their touching and squeezing by making small toys of different textures, so they have a general idea. (Grigerenko, 1995, p205) The home environment should be made conducive for the child in call of its safety and ease of movement. All the safety aspects of the windows, doors, sharp things and flames etc should be unploughed in mind.The Executive-Function DeficitsThere have been attempts to elucidate and explain the executive function deficit in people with autism through the reasoning of mind blindness theory it is too early to equate autism directly with complete executive function failure. Problems in executive functions cannot explain all aspects of the nonsocial impairments in autism and more importantly, cannot, on the face of it, explain the intact and superior skills sometimes exhibited by autistic children. The spiky IQ profile is a case in point block design, which is so often a greenback in autism, is considered a good test of fluid intelligence, which in turn relies on executive abilities. Happe, F. (1996).Executive function deficits are not limited to the disorder of autism. These deficits can be seen in attention deficit disorders, hyper use disorders, Tourette syndrome and phenylketonuria etc Happe, F. (1996). Since these diseases amongst others do not follow the theory o mind therefore the executive function deficit cannot be expected to present itself in accordance with ToM in all case scenarios. (McEvoy, 2004, p563)A study by Baron, Cohen (1985) forms the basis for deviation from the traditional view. It dissociat es recurrent and stuck-in-set preservations in the cognitive performance of autistic individuals, showing that the former was specifically associated with the presence of lower-level repetitive behaviours (e.g. stereotyped movements), whereas the latter was specifically associated with the presence of higher-level repetitive behaviours (e.g. draw interests) (Joseph R M, 1999).Yet, if the executive dysfunction theory is to provide a persuade alternative to the theory of mind view of autism, it needs to demonstrate similar associations between executive deficits and the impairments in social and communicative functioning that are so centrally defining of the disorder. Thus far, attempts to make such connections have not been replicated, or have suggested that executive deficits, although present, do not have a causal role in the social and communicative impairments. (Joseph R M, 1999).Personal ThoughtsMind blindness hypothesis concerning autism presents and can even explain the ofte n overlooked fact that people suffering from autism suffer not unless from the inability to assign states of the mental sort to other people , but they also fail to achieve or assign a chip order mental awareness level about themselves. It can be argued that the theory of mind hypothesis can be used to explain the self attribution and acknowledgement as well as others attribution.The theory of mind can easily greenback for and provide an explanation for autistic patients lack of self and others mental awareness. Explain the reason why autistic people have narrow range of interests and have deficits in comprehending problems and finding their solutions. This can be explained as autistics do not have second order awareness about their own thought processes.Conclusion In conclusion autistic disorder remains an enigma whose research studies have not yet managed to decipher the different parts to elucidate both the causes and the resulting disruption of brain function. However, it is hoped that the preliminary data obtained in physiological psychology, genetics, biochemistry or brain imaging may help in the coming years to identify subgroups of study subjects more homogeneous autism, providing other dimensions to explanation of the condition that the only concept too broad for autistic disorder. Since autism is a developmental disorder of the neurological type, it presents a challenge of how so diverse anomalies in higher centres of the body can lead to characteristic patterns and behaviours. Autism as a condition requires a lot of patience on part of the care takers to ferment out positive changes in the patient. These children need acceptance and patience to be dealt with. Their comfort with the gild and their mates at school will only be possible if they have the acceptance and proper dealing at home. Parents have the utmost responsibility to make things comfortable for their child and be supportive towards them so they can be better people devoted to dea l with their deficiencies in future.References and bibliographyAutism Fact sheet, (2007). National institute of neurological disorders and stroke. Retrieved on thirtieth March.2008 from http//www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/autism/detail_autism.htmBaron-Cohen, (2004), the essential difference. London Penguin, 2004Baron-Cohen S, Leslie A.M, Frith U. Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 1985 21 3746Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisaraya, d., Gurunathan, N. wheelwright, S. (2002) The systemizing quotient an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal society London B. Available from Baron-Cohens web pages, p45Centre for disease control and prevention (2007). Retrieved on thirtieth March.2008 from http//www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/symptoms.htmExecutive functions, (2007). Retrieved on 30th March.2008 from http//www.minddisorders.com/Del-Fi/Executive-function.htmlGrigerenko, E . L. Stemberg, R. J. (1995) thought Styles, in Saklofske, D. H. Zeidner (eds) International handbook of Personality and Intelligence, bare-assed York Plenum Press, 205-230Happe, F. and Frith U (1996). The neuropsychology of Autism, Brain, 119 1377-1400. Retrieved on 30th March.2008 from http//brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/119/4/1377?maxtoshow=HITS=10hits=10RESULTFORMAT=fulltext=autism+executive+function+deficitsearchid=1FIRSTINDEX=0resourcetype=HWCITHappe, F. (1999) Autism cognitive deficit or cognitive style, Trends in Cognitive sciences, 3 (6), p216-222Joseph, RM., (1999). Neuropsychological Frameworks for Understanding Autism. International review of Psychiatry, 11 309-324 Retrieved on 30th March.2008 from http//www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1351137Johnston, E, (1997), Autism, investigating minds. Retrieved on 30th March.2008 from http//pages.slc.edu/ebj/IM_97/Lecture21/L21.htmlObernman et al. (2005) Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 190-198.R owe et al, (2001). Theory of mind impairments and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain, 124 600-616, Retrieved on 30th March.2008 from http//brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/124/3/600?maxtoshow=HITS=10hits=10RESULTFORMAT=fulltext=autism+false+belief+tasksearchid=1FIRSTINDEX=0resourcetype=HWCITRiding, R. Raynr, S. (1988) Cognitive styles and learning strategies understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London David Fulton, p1-9Shaw P, et al. (2004). The impact of early and late damage to the human amygdala on theory of mind reasoning. Brain. 127 1535-1548. Retrieved on 30th March.2008 fromhttp//brain.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/127/7/1535?maxtoshow=HITS=10hits=10RESULTFORMAT=fulltext=autism+false+belief+tasksearchid=1FIRSTINDEX=0resourcetype=HWCITWitkin, Hrman A. (1981) cognitive styles essence and origins field dependence and field independence, New York International Universities Press, p45