Treatment of Homosexuality in Restoration and Enlightenment

Treat manpowert of Homo sexuality in riposte and discern mentHomosexuality and the Problem of Identification in Restoration and Enlightenment EnglandRestoration and Enlightenment England undeniably inherited, and to a liberal extent carried on the fond, spiritual, and court-ordered prejudices, or restrictions towards paederastic men that already existed for m either centuries. The enounce and extensive feelings against quirkiness in England which could be realizeed as homophobic, as else where were strongly related to Christian immortal and its strong influence upon prevailing social sides. There are several discoverright and clear condemnations of paederasticity in both the Old and New Testaments that influenced Christian theology to refute homoity as a deeply arch and immoral act.1 Outside of Judeo- Christian theology and ideology, tribadisticity had non al itinerarys been condemned or morally and socially vilified. Indeed in guile little Greece and Rome wor ld openly lesbian seemingly left men without insalubrious social, spiritual, or legal consequences, which meant that some men had b other(a)wiseed to cover up their queer identities, feelings, activities, and bearingstyles. All that had mixtured erst Christianity had become the dominant religion throughout Europe and taught that homosexuality was brachydactylous and sinful behaviour, and led to actions which were morally indefensible.2 The conversion had rekindled interest in classical Greek and papist art, literature, and sculpture, which in parts point of referenceed homosexuality as a normal and un-sinful part of every daylight life. An unintended by product of the Renaissance had been the realisation that manful homosexuality had non always been socially, or conscientiously taboo, and that it had non therefore been illegal in classical Greece or Rome. These in front societies had not held homosexual men in disdain or do them social outcasts soon enough they w ere supposed to be immoral and degenerate compared to Christian societies. The realisation that alone Judeo-Christian societies were so predominantly homophobic provided an impulse for homosexual men to alter their societies by arguing that they were free to chose how they delayd their lives and were not unfeignedly morally depraved. The initial moves to allow homosexual men to live openly started in Southern Europe before having an impact in Renaissance and Enlightenment England.3Arguably the renewal disrupted the liberalising effects of the Renaissance, yet would even sotually engineer to increased levels of secularisation, and to the more(prenominal) liberal academic, social, and scientific attitudes of the Enlightenment. The more immediate consequences of the Reformation was increased attempts to rid Western European societies of sour theology and cleanse it of immorality much(prenominal) as homosexuality, although the resultant roleing conflicts mingled with Roman C atholicism and Protestantism received the most attention amongst contemporaries and historians a manage.4 In England the blast of the Reformation had not altered the ticklish situations that homosexual men confront if they wished to live their lives openly. That was due to the Protestants whether within the Church of England or the non-conformists outside of it being as opposed to male homosexuality as the Roman Catholic Church had always been. For the churches, homosexual thoughts or desires were and as sinful as actually do homosexual acts. However if homosexual men refrained from acting upon their desires they would at least escape earthly punishment for their sins, which would be judged by God on their Judgement Day. Homosexual men either had to hide their sexual preferences or deny them completely. For they had virtually no resource to shroudment their orientation or gender realizations, and leading clandestine offstage lives. Hiding sexual orientation could make all the difference between been socially and sparingally successful or been discredited, and possibly extendd. Rumours of being homosexual could mount to be ruinous whether such allegations were proven or not. If actual homosexual acts could be proved to become taken place beyond doubt in an English teetotum Court it would be blackened to those convicted. The high risks convoluted in leading a homosexual life even in secret benefactors to explain the lack of evidence that homosexual men left behind about themselves, as leaving culture in writing or talking to the wrong people could impart to being convicted and then executed.5The concealment of homosexual identification was almost universally considered to be essential in England introductory to the Restoration and Enlightenment eras, and re master(prenominal)ed passing important throughout those times. For men that held powerful social, economic, governmental, and religious positions being publically identified or just rumoured to be a homosexual could prove to be disastrous for the maintenance of their position. Such rumours could reach the top of the political, social, and religious orders. During the 1590s until his death, even the Archbishop of Canterbury, John Whitgift came under suspicion of being sexually involved with another man. Whitgift was lucky enough to maintain the confidence of Elizabeth I as well as James I and therefore was not disgraced or removed from his post. Clergy had to be above suspicion of immoral sexual conduct whether homosexual or straight extraneous in personality. The fact that England as a Protestant country allowed clerical marriage meant that the clergy could gratify straightaway contains through marriage, whilst homosexual clergy if they existed had to preach the teachings of a religion that despised their sexuality.6The higher position a man held the greater the effort he would go for put into hiding his homosexual orientation and identification. For inst ance, in the fourteenth century Edward IIs known homosexuality, when combined with his political stiffness contributed to his removal from the throne, and his subsequent murder. Kings were expected to be more manful than any other men within society are, as they were expected to lead their countries during wartime, for kings to be suspected or known to be homosexual was detrimental for their chances of reigning over their countries successfully. Nearer to the Restoration and Enlightenment eras, the Duke of Buckingham was widely believed to ease up become the most influential and powerful royal favourite, not to mention the chief minister via his rumoured homosexual relationship with James I. Buckingham managed to form a similarly close relationship with Charles I, who seemed oblivious to the Dukes unpopularity and incompetence. Rumours of homosexuality did not damage Buckingham as much as his ineptness, yet they did not help improve his popularity either.7For homosexual men in Re storation and Enlightenment England, their social, political, and religious exclusion if their sexual orientation became public knowledge was attributable to the way in which homosexuality was regarded as being tantamount to buggery by a legal age of the heterosexual population. Sodomy was deemed to be as overserious a sin as heresy and witchcraft, as the definition of sodomy incorporated all sexually deviant acts.8 In earlier periods, males caught committing homosexual acts were usually trialed and punished by Church courts. The law was changed in 1534 in order for people accused of buggery to be trialed by Crown courts. The legislation of 1534 made it even more heartrending for male homosexuals to be known as being sexually active, or even to have their orientation known. The maximum punishment for any man caught and convicted for this crime was execution. gum olibanum making buggery a crime punishable by death, in line with the sentences for heresy and witchcraft. The only d ifference was that the practice of executing heretics and maintain witches had gone by the end of the Enlightenment era, whereas the carrying out of homosexual activities was stable a capital offence until 1861 and a crime until the 1960s9.Immediately prior to the Restoration period had been the Commonwealth, which had attempted to rigorously enforce all moral and religious values to meet with its fundamentalist Protestant ideology, including all heterosexual and homosexual sex outside of marriage. Whilst the Puritanical regime inspired by Oliver Cromwell had intended to cleanse the whole of Britain of its sins, it failed. During the Commonwealth period heterosexual adulterers as well as respectable Anglicans had to lead clandestine existences just like homosexuals and Roman Catholics had done for many decades.10 Charles IIs return from eject ushered in the era of the Restoration, which brought a relaxation of the draconian moral codes of the Commonwealth, oddly in the Royal Cou rt. Despite his own immoral behaviour, Charles II only went as far as wanting religious toleration sort of than officially supporting a relaxation of moral and sexual standards of behaviour. purge had Charles wished to improve the legal position of homosexual men he would have not been prepared to face public and Parliamentary opposition to such plans.11 Whilst the Restoration may have meant a more relaxed moral attitude at the Royal Court, there was no change in the legal position of men caught performing homosexual acts.12 Concealment of homosexual identification or the protection of men in high social and religious positions was the best way to stay clear of prosecution and ultimately execution.13 reenforcement in towns and cities in general and in capital of the United Kingdom in concomitant improved the chances of homosexual men not being caught, and leading a more fulfilling existence.14Homosexual men to an overwhelming extent publicly appeared to converge in with the gen der role models during the Restoration and Enlightenment eras in England. As not conforming to conventional gender role models would have revealed their indistinguishability as homosexual men, many therefore decided to cover up their true identity to avoid persecution and their own personal disgrace. Homosexual men therefore, had to perform the gender roles expected of heterosexual men, such as being husbands, fathers and acting as heads of their households. Getting married and having children was the best means of concealing homosexual identification and removing suspicions of any sexual wrongdoing or immorality. hands of all social, economic and religious situation were homosexuals, yet the higher their status the more they had to lose by revealing their sexual orientation. Self-preservation was presumably a greater motivation than self-expression or self-fulfilment. Although it must have made myriad numbers of homosexual men in Restoration and Enlightenment England the Reformat ion had weakened the hold of Christianity over society unknown to anybody at that time. The main long-term consequence of Protestantism was to increase the level of secularisation in England, although other social values reinforced prejudices towards homosexual men.15 The Enlightenment continued the play of secularisation started by the Renaissance and only delayed by the Reformation, which slowly made English social and genders values more liberal and slight repressive.16 In many respects social prejudices against homosexual men outlasted the religious reasons for homosexuality being illegal in England in the first place. The alarm of sodomy as an unnatural form of sexual behaviour persisted even as English society became increasingly secularised.17The treatment of homosexual men in Restoration and Enlightenment England was not the same throughout the country. capital of the United Kingdom was a city in which homosexual men could attempt to be more open about their sexual orient ation and worry slight about fulfilling expected gender roles. As one of the biggest cities in the world, capital of the United Kingdom was place in which homosexual men had an increased level of opportunities to be true to themselves, rather than outwardly conform to social and religious norms with regard to sexual conduct. Homosexual men that remained publicly unknown had to carry on living up to widespread masculine stereotypes.18 These comments have to be qualified, as although London was a cosmopolitan centre where it was possible to lead various lifestyles that differed from the Christian and heterosexual norm. London was excessively the part of England in which the garner of the law could be enforced most vigorously, as it was the seat of judicature and Courts and magistrates would not want to be seen as unable to tackle cruel and immoral activities. As individuals homosexuals may have been able to lead homosexual lives with the protection of people in high places. Howe ver, at the end of the day it still remained sensible for homosexual men to hide their orientation as the legislation that could result in their condemnation and execution remained upon the statute books.19 For the bulk of homosexual men in Restoration and Enlightenment England the opportunities to be pronto identifiable as homosexuals were strictly moderate and even when those chances were available it remained dangerous to take them. Some careers such as acting or sing gave a few homosexual men the chance to appear less masculine in public without raising undue suspicions of their sexual orientation. The majority of homosexual men were in the situation where they had to perform the social, economic, religious, or political functions that their position at birth had put them into. The majority of social, political, religious, and economic positions in Restoration and Enlightenment meant that all men had to perform their tasks in masculine ways. 20Therefore, it could be concluded that the circumstances of the times made it very difficult for homosexual men to clearly allow themselves to be identified as such by their contemporaries in Restoration and Enlightenment England. It has also made it harder for modern historians to qualify and quantify the number and the experiences of homosexual men during that period. As was explored and evaluated above there were various reasons for homosexual men to conceal their sexual orientation from becoming general public knowledge, and to carry out any homosexual activities in secret, if at all. The overwhelmingly Christian nature of England before, during, and after the Restoration and Enlightenment eras had a very strong upon how homosexual men had to hide their sexual preferences from English society as a whole. Before the Reformation, the Roman Catholic Church had wide acceptance of its theology and opinions with regard to male homosexuality. The Roman Catholic Church had taught that all male homosexual activities shou ld be regarded as deadly sins, which stemmed from all homosexual men having morally deviant thoughts that inevitably led to behaviour which requisite to be severely punished, even to the point of executing homosexual men. Basically, Christian ideology was opposed to homosexuality on the grounds that it was an intolerable sin, just like heresy and witchcraft, which needed to be eradicated. The Reformation did not change the Christian perspective that male homosexuals should be punished as and when they were caught performing homosexual acts. Indeed the legislation that allowed the English Crown Courts to prosecute and execute people convicted of buggery was passed by the Reformation Parliament that enacted the break away of the English Church from the Papacy. The knowledge that being caught performing homosexual acts would result in execution meant that all men that performed such acts by and large did so in complete secrecy to avoid capital punishment. The need for self preservatio n meant that the vast majority of homosexual men concealed their identities to stay alive and free, with the options to carry out homosexual activities in secret, or abstain from meeting other men altogether. To remain successfully unfathomed from people that index have them prosecuted the majority of homosexual men would chose not to leave written documentary evidence of their sexual activities or their feelings towards other men, as such material could easily have led to their conviction and subsequent execution. Homosexual men could have been from any social and economic background, as homosexuality seems to occur naturally within some men. after(prenominal) all it would hardly have been nurtured within Restoration and Enlightenment societies in England that overwhelmingly regarded homosexuality as being wrong and unnatural. Only limited numbers of homosexual men felt save enough not to hide their orientation, living in London, or having rich and powerful protectors were the factors that might allow some degree of openness.BibliographyAshley M, (2002) A brief history of British Kings Queens, Robinson, LondonBetteridge T, (2002) Sodomy in Early Modern Europe, Manchester University Press, ManchesterFernandez-Arnesto, F Wilson, D (1996) Reformation Christianity and the World 1500-2000, Bantam Press, LondonGardiner Wenborn (1995) The History Today come with to British History, Collins and Brown Ltd, LondonLenman, (2004) Chambers mental lexicon of World History, Chambers, EdinburghMacCulloch D, Reformation Europes House Divided (2004) Penguin Books, LondonSchama, S (2001) A History of Britain The British Wars 1603-1776, BBC Worldwide, London1Footnotes1 MacCulloch, 2004 p. 6202 MacCulloch, 2004 p. 6203 Betteridge, 2002 pp. 71 744 Roberts, 1996 p. 2355 MacCulloch, 2004 p. 2096 MacCulloch, 2004 p. 2097 Betteridge, 2002 p. 468 MacCulloch, 2004, p.6229 Gardiner Wenborn, 1995, p.38810 Schama, 2001, p.23511 Ashley, 2002, p.32012 Gardiner Wenborn, 1995, p. 64613 Betteridge, 2002, pp.71-7414 MacCulloch, 2004, p.62015 Fernandez-Armesto Wilson, 1996, p.29016 Lenman, 2004, p.26417 Gardiner Wenborn, 1995, p.38818 Betteridge, 2002, pp. 71-7419 MacCulloch, 2004, p.62220 Betteridge, 2002 pp. 71-74